Another national research showed that 40 percent of low income house owners who rehomed their pets reported that access to inexpensive vet care would have helped them keep their pet (Weiss et al 2015). Indeed, current research level to the alternative; that there is not a correlation between income and a pet owner’s need and commitment to offer essential care to her animal companions (Poresky & Daniels 1998; Staats et al 1996). We have also realized that people who find themselves financially disadvantaged do not love their pets any less than these with extra wealth. Surveys of homeless pet owners reveal a level of attachment to their pets that could be greater than that reported by pet owners who stay in traditional residences (Irvine 2013). Indeed, as Leslie Irvine, who conducted a research of seventy two homeless pet house owners in California, Colorado and Florida factors out, keeping a pet whereas homeless entails an intense level of commitment and greater than a little hardship (Id.).
The ASPCA believes that keeping individuals and pets together, every time it is potential and acceptable to take action, should be a precedence for the animal welfare group and for society as a whole. To achieve this aim, we must put aside preconceived notions and treat folks with respect and dignity no matter their monetary or different life circumstances. We must assist laws and policies that strengthen and help rather than break the bond between individuals and their animal companions.